A US federal judge has struck down Donald Trump’s $15bn defamation lawsuit against the New York Times newspaper, citing issues with its contents.
US District Judge Steven Merryday in his ruling on Friday said Trump had violated a federal rule requiring applicants to outline in a “short and plain statement” why they deserve relief from the court.
A legal complaint, the judge said, is not “a protected platform to rage against an adversary”. He gave Trump 28 days to file an amended complaint.
Trump signalled he would sue the New York Times earlier this week in a post on Truth Social, claiming the newspaper has been “allowed to freely lie, smear and defame me for far too long”.
The New York Times responded to the lawsuit by saying it has “no merit.”
“It lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting,” the newspaper said in a statement earlier this week.
In his order on Friday, Judge Merryday said the lawsuit filed by Trump is “repetitive” and “superfluous”.
The 85-page lawsuit was filed in federal court in Tampa earlier this week. It also names Penguin Random House LLC – which published a book by Times reporters last year – and accuses the newspaper of serving as a “mouthpiece” for Democrats.
Judge Merryday wrote in his ruling that even if Trump’s allegations were proven to be true, and even if the lawsuit were interpreted in a “generous and lenient” manner, the way it was written violates the rules of the court and is “decidedly improper and impermissible.”
Neither President Trump nor his lawyers have yet responded to Judge Merryday’s decision.
