Julius Malema’s legal team has dismissed the state’s assertion that imposing a fine would effectively allow the EFF leader to avoid a prison sentence by paying his way out.
Malema is due back at the East London Magistrate’s Court on Friday, where proceedings will focus on sentencing in his firearm discharge case.
– Advertisement –
The argument emerged during the cross-examination of a social worker, when the prosecution challenged a recommendation that Malema receive a suspended fine instead of a custodial sentence.
State Questions Fine as Alternative to Prison
Prosecutor Joel Caeser put it to the court that a financial penalty could be seen as enabling Malema to use his resources to escape imprisonment.
The comment was made while scrutinising the social worker’s proposal, which favoured a non-custodial outcome.
The state’s position suggested that a fine, in this context, would undermine the principle of equal treatment before the law.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Malema Firearm Trial: Social Worker Urges Leniency As Court Sets April 15 For Sentencing
In response, Malema’s advocate, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, rejected the notion that a fine was inappropriate or unlawful. He argued that financial penalties are a recognised part of South Africa’s sentencing framework.
“The first difficulty which perhaps we can address is that a fine is part of the sentencing architecture of this country. It’s in the legislation. What impact does that actually have on particular biases against people who are perceived to occupy a certain level of status in society?”
– Advertisement –
The court is expected to continue weighing sentencing considerations as Malema’s case proceeds.
The court has set April 15 for sentencing.
For More, Follow SurgeZirc SA On Facebook, X, Instagram and Bluesky
– Advertisement –
