China’s zero-tariff offer to 53 African countries looks, at first sight, like a trade story. It is more than that. It marks a wider shift in China-Africa business relations: from market access to strategic openness. Tariff-free access opens an important door, but it does not by itself create exports, build industries or shift ba
rgaining power.
The real question is whether African countries can use this opening to strengthen productive capacity, support domestic firms, upgrade exports and capture more value. In this new phase, success will depend less on access alone than on the institutions, standards, logistics, finance and capabilities that turn openness into development.
Market access is not market readiness
Market access on its own does not transform economies. Zero tariffs may open the door, but they do not automatically create exports. For many African firms, the real constraints lie upstream: standards compliance, rules of origin, certification, logistics, cold chains, customs systems, trade finance and firm-level capacity.
Market access is like opening a highway. But many African producers still need the feeder roads that allow them to reach it, compete on it and help shape the rules of the road.
For business, this shifts the question from market entry to market readiness. The winners will be those able to meet Chinese standards, manage logistics, finance working capital, build reliable supply and negotiate fair terms with buyers, platforms and investors.
Beyond “China Inc.”
Ten years ago, our World Development article on Chinese state capitalism and development cooperation in Africa challenged a powerful but misleading image: that of a seamless Chinese state-business apparatus moving coherently across the African continent. Looking at agricultural projects in Zimbabwe and Mozambique, we showed that China’s engagement was more fragmented, decentralised and negotiated than much of the debate allowed. Provinces, state agencies, firms and African governments all shaped outcomes in uneven ways. Implementation mattered as much as policy design.
A decade later, that argument still holds. But the terrain has changed. China-Africa business relations are better understood as a shifting ecology of state agencies, provincial governments, firms, digital platforms, investors, African governments and local entrepreneurs. China is no longer only a financier, contractor or source of infrastructure. It is also a market, technology provider, platform builder, standards actor, investor and geopolitical partner.
The scale is now striking. China–Africa trade reached a record US$348 billion in 2025. But the headline figure masks a persistent imbalance: China’s exports to Africa were about US$225 billion, while its imports from Africa were about US$123 billion. African economies therefore still face the challenge of moving beyond raw-material exports and using new market access to build productive capacity, standards compliance and value-added trade.
This is why China’s tariff-free offer is significant, but not sufficient. It may help countries and sectors already close to export readiness. But it will not by itself change the structure of China-Africa trade.
The wider context has also changed. Development cooperation is being reshaped by geopolitical rivalry, supply-chain restructuring, digital infrastructure, debt stress, green transition pressures and the search for new models of growth. Western aid and research partnerships have become more constrained. South-South cooperation has become more self-confident. African governments are navigating a crowded field of partners, including China, Europe, the US, the Gulf, India, Brazil and others.
At the Harvard College China Forum’s ‘China and Africa’ session in April, what struck me most was how far the debate has moved beyond the older language of aid, cooperation and infrastructure. China-Africa relations are now part of a wider contest over markets, supply chains, industrial strategy, debt, technology, minerals and geopolitical positioning.
Africa is not simply a recipient of Chinese finance or expertise. African countries are seeking investment, bargaining space and development options across multiple partnerships. This is the most important shift. It is not only China’s behaviour that has changed. African bargaining has changed too. African governments and firms are testing how Chinese trade, investment and technology can be used alongside other partnerships to expand policy space and strengthen domestic capabilities.
Governing strategic openness
By strategic openness, I mean openness used with purpose: not simple liberalisation, and not closure in the name of sovereignty, but engagement backed by institutions, domestic capability and bargaining strategy.
The question is how countries can use external markets, investment and technology to build productive capacity, reduce dependency, manage risk and increase bargaining power. Markets need to remain open enough to create opportunity, but governed enough to support domestic upgrading, resilience and strategic choice.
Both China and African countries have reasons to keep channels open. China needs markets, resources, partners and diplomatic support in a more contested global economy. African countries need investment, infrastructure, technology, export opportunities and greater room for manoeuvre. But openness must be managed carefully. Cross-border data, e-commerce platforms, digital payments, critical minerals, green supply chains and financial exposure all create opportunities, but also new vulnerabilities.
The next phase of China–Africa business relations will therefore be shaped not only by who builds roads, ports or platforms, but by who controls data, standards, finance, minerals, logistics and the terms of market entry. This is clear in digital, green and agribusiness sectors. Chinese firms are already involved in telecommunications, e-commerce, fintech, solar energy, electric vehicles, batteries, logistics and agricultural technology. These sectors can support African industrialisation and job creation. But they also raise questions about data sovereignty, market dominance, technology dependence, debt exposure and local value addition.
The question is how to govern African engagement with Chinese firms in ways that strengthen African agency. The older debate about whether China is a development opportunity or a dependency trap is no longer adequate. There are opportunities in market access, infrastructure, technology, finance and industrial learning. There are also risks in uneven trade, weak local linkages, limited transparency, debt exposure, data dependence and unequal bargaining power.
For African governments, tariff-free access must be matched by investment in standards agencies, export promotion, customs systems, certification, logistics, cold chains and productive capacity. Digital trade requires stronger data governance, competition policy and local enterprise development. Foreign investment should be assessed not only by volume, but by technology transfer, local employment, tax contribution, environmental standards and its ability to support domestic firms.
A practical agenda
This shift also creates a practical agenda for development partners, development finance institutions and research funders. Their priority should be targeted support for the systems that allow African firms to use market access: standards infrastructure, export finance, trade facilitation, customs modernisation, digital governance, competition policy and sector-specific upgrading.
For China, the credibility of its Africa policy will increasingly depend not only on the scale of trade and investment, but on whether Chinese openness supports African industrialisation, export diversification and local value creation. If tariff-free access mainly expands China’s exports while African exports remain concentrated in raw materials, the language of mutual benefit will become harder to sustain.
Today’s ‘new politics of development cooperation’ has become more commercial, more digital, more geopolitical and more embedded in the practical constraints of production, trade and industrial transformation. China has opened an important door. But the harder questions remain: who can export, who finances upgrading, who certifies products, who controls platforms and data, who captures value and who bears risk?
The future of China-Africa business relations will not be decided by tariffs alone. It will be decided by whether African countries can turn openness into capability, investment into resilience and partnership into strategic choice
The views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of IDS.
AfricaChina
