A pattern is emerging within our schooling system that needs highlighting as South Africa faces its next major technology decision. In coding and robotics, with the best intentions, directives were given, curriculum was developed and then the move forward-stalled. We are beginning to see take shape again with AI.
Globally, the question is no longer whether artificial intelligence should be used in schools, but how it can be integrated responsibly, ethically and effectively. Most countries entered the generative AI debate with national AI or digital strategies already in place, many updated since 2023.
The OECD’s Digital Education Outlook 2026 notes that the most common immediate policy response has been national or system-level guidance covering ethical use, academic integrity, data protection, and the roles of teachers and students. In South Africa, we are still waiting for that conversation to begin properly.
Without direction from the department of basic education, teachers are experimenting with AI tools on their own because learners are already using them at home, and pretending otherwise is not a strategy. Without a shared framework, the outcome will be uneven – some learners receiving structured exposure, others receiving none, with no curriculum designed to build progressively from one year to the next.
AI literacy cannot be introduced through a once-off lesson or isolated workshop. Like mathematics or language, it needs to develop over time, with foundational skills built grade by grade. Teachers also need training to help learners use these tools in ways that strengthen thinking rather than simply outsource it.
Familiar pattern
My concern is that we are slipping into a familiar pattern. The DBE spent years building momentum around “fourth Industrial Revolution” skills such as coding, robotics and future-readiness. Curriculum pilots were launched, timelines announced and educators, myself included, invested considerable time writing manuals and preparing classroom material.
Then the focus shifted back to foundational literacy and numeracy because the system was not ready for what had been promised. Educators were left holding work prepared for programmes that never fully materialised.
Read: Gen Z has stopped buying the AI dream
That is not a criticism of prioritising literacy and numeracy; those challenges are real and urgent, and we cannot progress when children cannot read. That a September 2025 promised revision of the white paper on e-education, first developed in 2004, has not happened is concerning in an era in which technological advances are moving at lightning speed.
Since AI cannot be policed, just like the use of Google cannot, learners need to be taught how to interact with and integrate these tools critically and honestly. Without that, we are doing our children a disservice. They will enter a world where AI is embedded in everyday systems, processes and decision-making, without the building blocks to navigate it.
For parents, no policy means no clarity on what their children are being exposed to or how. For teachers, it means navigating fast-moving technology without standards, training or support.
The question is no longer whether AI should feature in education as it already does. The real issue is whether South Africa can move beyond discussion and provide the clarity, consistency and implementation that schools, teachers and learners actually need.
- The author, Celeste Labuschagne, is a PhD candidate and lecturer and learning framework developer at Belgium Campus iTversity
