Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema has come under fire on social media platform X (formerly Twitter) after saying South Africans should be prioritised in employment opportunities and tender allocations.
While Malema has long championed the idea of a united Africa in his political rhetoric, critics argue his latest remarks contradict his pan-Africanist stance.
– Advertisement –
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE: Floyd Shivambu To Consult King Misuzulu On Launch Of New Political Movement
The EFF leader made the statement while addressing supporters, emphasising the need to protect South Africans’ economic interests in a challenging job market, and asked Zimbabweans to seek employment in Zimbabwe.
This sparked a wave of criticism online, with some accusing him of abandoning his vision of continental unity. Others accused him of adopting a “South Africans first” approach similar to rhetoric used by nationalist movements.
Supporters Defend Malema’s Stance
Despite the backlash, many of Malema’s supporters have rushed to his defence, insisting that his comments were taken out of context. They argue that the EFF leader has consistently fought for South Africans to benefit from government contracts and employment, while still promoting the broader vision of African unity.
“Malema has never compromised on his commitment to South Africans. He speaks about African unity, yes, but he has always insisted that South Africans must not be left behind,” one supporter wrote on X.
The controversy highlights the tension between local economic realities and pan-African ideals. South Africa’s high unemployment rate—sitting above 30%—often fuels debates about job security and the prioritisation of citizens over foreign nationals.
– Advertisement –
Pan-Africanism vs. National Priorities
This is not the first time Malema’s comments on African unity have sparked heated debate. In 2019, his call for the scrapping of borders across Africa drew both praise and criticism, with some praising the vision of a united continent while others questioned its practicality given South Africa’s socio-economic challenges.
The latest uproar shows how Malema’s balancing act between pan-Africanism and national priorities continues to stir controversy. As the EFF positions itself ahead of the 2026 elections, how Malema addresses this tension may shape both his party’s appeal and his legacy.
For More SA Politics, Follow SurgeZirc SA On Facebook, X and Instagram
– Advertisement –