As an attorney, I was trained to live inside documents: case files, depositions, transcripts, contracts and endless emails. As a novelist, I now live inside fictional worlds. At first, those roles may seem miles apart. Yet when I sit down to draft a chapter or a legal argument, I’m reminded that both are ultimately about storytelling.
My years in the courtroom, along with my service as an Army combat veteran, shaped how I write. Law sharpened my precision; the military forged my resilience. Fiction gave me a way to merge both. And at the center of that bridge is a skill lawyers often underestimate: narrative craft.
Discovery is the clearest example. Lawyers know the grind: hundreds of hours combing through data, highlighting a phrase here, flagging an inconsistency there. Most of it will never appear in court. But every so often you find the one detail that reframes the entire case. Writing a novel feels the same. The first draft is a mess of notes, research and false starts. The art is in selection—in cutting what doesn’t serve the story and lifting forward what does. Both the attorney and the author curate meaning from noise.
That curating skill shaped my novel American Anne Frank, which follows a suburban family hiding undocumented immigrants. The story required me to sift through dozens of possible angles, just as I would in discovery, until I found the emotional core. My military fantasy novel Stonebreaker demanded the same process: identifying which details about loyalty, survival and conflict revealed the truth of the characters and the world. In both books, the lessons of discovery guided me.
But storytelling in law is about more than evidence. Every lawyer knows that winning an argument takes more than statutes and citations. Persuasion depends on balancing precision with humanity. A jury might respect logic, but it’s moved by narrative. Judges, too, respond to clarity and cohesion. That’s why the strongest legal briefs read less like a data dump and more like a story with stakes.
Cross-examination illustrates this overlap. Good cross is about tension, pacing and revelation—the same tools writers use in dialogue. A witness hedges, contradicts or resists, and the attorney brings those fractures into the light. Characters in fiction behave the same way. They conceal, deflect and clash, and it’s in those moments that their humanity emerges. In Stonebreaker, I treated every character’s voice like a witness under questioning: credible, consistent and revealing under pressure.
The through line is simple: both law and writing demand credibility. A misplaced citation can unravel a case; a hollow character can collapse a story. Precision and humanity are not opposites—they’re allies. The most persuasive closing arguments are also the most human. The most enduring novels are also the most disciplined.
Too often, young attorneys are told to strip their writing of humanity in favor of objectivity. But the law is about people. A brief that frames a case as a story—of a business betrayed, a family harmed, a community disrupted—lands differently than one that reads like a checklist of precedent. Fiction reminds us of that truth. Stories endure because they speak to both mind and heart.
That’s why creative writing is not a distraction from the practice of law but an enhancement. Every case has a beginning, middle and end. Discovery is exposition. Motions are rising action. Trial is climax. A case with no theme feels scattered. A case with a theme—justice, fairness, accountability—feels coherent. Lawyers who think like storytellers present their cases with more clarity and impact.
When I left the Army for law and later law for fiction, I assumed I was moving between separate worlds. But the longer I’ve written, the clearer it’s become: All three paths are connected. The Army taught me endurance. Law taught me precision. Fiction taught me empathy. Together, they remind me that whether in a courtroom or a novel, the ultimate question is the same: What story will endure?
For lawyers, the lesson is not simply that writing matters but that storytelling matters. Every deposition, every motion, every trial is an opportunity to shape a narrative that will be remembered, not just read. Writers know this instinctively. Lawyers, too, should embrace it.
Because in the end, the law is a story we tell about justice. And if we tell it well, it resonates far beyond the courtroom.
Patrick Camuñez is an Arizona-based novelist and a compliance attorney whose work explores the intersection of law, history and social justice. He is the author of American Anne Frank, a contemporary reimagining of Anne Frank’s story set against modern debates over immigration and civil rights.
ABAJournal.com is accepting queries for original, thoughtful, nonpromotional articles and commentary by unpaid contributors to run in the Your Voice section. Details and submission guidelines are posted at “Your Submissions, Your Voice.”
This column reflects the opinions of the author and not necessarily the views of the ABA Journal—or the American Bar Association.
