Why can’t citizens protest government decisions… being made slaves by slapping cases: Bombay High Court | Legal News – The Indian Express
skip to content
Why can’t citizens protest government decisions… being made slaves by slapping cases: Bombay High Court
Justice Jamdar questioned why the Mumbai Police externed the petitioner over FIRs linked to protests, where slogans such as “BJP government murdabad” and “Amit Shah murdabad” were raised
Written by:Omkar Gokhale
MumbaiUpdated: Jul 3, 2026 08:52 AM IST
Justice Madhav J Jamdar of the Bombay High Court
Setting aside a Mumbai Police externment order against a political activist, the Bombay High Court Thursday observed that merely arranging a morcha or a protest against “certain decisions” of the BJP-led government at the Centre could not be a ground for externment, affecting the person’s fundamental rights
Referring to a plea by 49-year-old Saeed Ahmad Abdul Wahid Chaudhary, who said he was general secretary of the Socialist Democratic Party of India (SDPI) and had been externed for a year, the single-judge bench of Justice Madhav J Jamdar asked police if citizens were being made “slaves of the government” by slapping cases for opposing government decisions, and why they could not stage protests
Justice Jamdar sought to know why an externment order was issued by Mumbai Police relying on FIRs related to earlier protests by the petitioner where slogans including ‘BJP government murdabad’, ‘Amit Shah murdabad’ were raised
Referring to the recent exam paper leak case and the petitioner’s contention, he inquired why citizens cannot stage protests or raise slogans
“It is the right of the citizens to protest. The petitioner has just raised slogans like ‘BJP government murdabad’, ‘Amit Shah murdabad’… Why can’t citizens raise such slogans and why externment orders for such slogans?” Justice Jamdar said
Court cautions police
Cautioning the police, he said they were servants of the public and not that of top government functionaries
Petitioner Chaudhary had challenged the December 3, 2025 externment order of Deputy Commissioner of Police (Zone 6- Chembur area). He had been externed for a year
Story continues below this ad
Chaudhary’s plea claimed that the externment proceedings began with a show cause notice in October 2025 on the basis of multiple FIRs registered against him between 2019 and 2024 relating to protests. He alleged the action kept him away during civic elections, amounting to “stifling legitimate democratic dissent.”
Advocates Payoshi Roy and Ibraheem Harbat, appearing for Chaudhary, had submitted that all the FIRs were registered against the petitioner under IPC Section 188 (disobedience to order duly promulgated by public servant) for protests he organised or participated in including those related to the government’s decisions on the CAA and NRC, the issue of the Babri Masjid, and the sealing at the Gyanvapi mosque
The lawyers said none of these could attract Section 56 of the Maharashtra Police Act empowering the police to pass an externment order against a person about to commit an offence of causing danger, injury to person or property
Roy said Chaudhary was externed merely for organising or participating in protests without giving him an opportunity to prove himself innocent and, therefore, the action against him should be set aside
Story continues below this ad
The state lawyer pointed to certain slogans raised by the petitioner and other protestors and argued that the action was in accordance with the law as the protests were held despite the police authorities having refused permission
In his order, Justice Jamdar described the Mumbai Police action as “vitiated” and “mala fide” and observed that “citizens have freedom to express their opinion” and “live with dignity” as per Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution
Justice Jamdar observed that there was “no material on record to show that the movements or acts of the Petitioner are causing or are calculated to cause alarm, danger or harm to person or property”
The judge noted that the allegations relate to an offence under Section 188 of the IPC, punishable with a maximum of a one-month jail term
Story continues below this ad
“However, that cannot be a ground for passing the externment order under the provisions of the Maharashtra Police Act,” the order reads
Justice Jamdar noted the “settled legal position that an order of externment is an extraordinary measure and effect of such order is of depriving a citizen of his fundamental right of free movement throughout the territory of India.”
The bench, while setting aside the externment action relied on past Supreme Court and High Court verdicts and held, “The action taken by the Respondent–State of Maharashtra of externing the Petitioner, merely for opposing certain decisions of the Government of India, affects the Petitioner’s fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression and also right to live with dignity.”
© The Indian Express Pvt Ltd
Omkar Gokhale
- Tags:
- Bombay High Court
Advertisement
Loading Recommendations…
Advertisement
Live Blog
- Mumbai Rains, Weather Highlights: Orange alerts in Mumbai, few other Maharashtra districts, as heavy rains flood parts of city45 seconds ago
- Portugal vs Croatia Live Updates, FIFA World Cup 2026: POR win 2-1 after CRO goal disallowed by VAR2 minutes ago
- ICAI CA Foundation Result 2026 Live Updates: Results releasing today at caresults.icai.org3 minutes ago
- Alpha Movie Review and Release LIVE Updates: Alia Bhatt-starrer eyes Rs 7-8 crore opening10 minutes ago
- CBSE 10th Second Board Result 2026 Live Updates: Results expected soon; where to check?53 minutes ago
