Should mediation period be excluded in deadline for filing written statement? Delhi HC refers issue to larger bench
Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court has referred to a larger bench the question on whether the time spent in mediation should be excluded while calculating the statutory deadline for filing written statements and replications in civil suits
Justice Subramonium Prasad observed that conflicting judicial opinions by coordinate and division benches have created uncertainty over the issue
Therefore, he directed that the matter be placed before Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya for the constitution of a bench of two or three judges to answer the following question:
-
Whether the time spent in mediation ought to be excluded while computing the limitation period prescribed for filing the written statement/replication as prescribed under chapter VII of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018?
“In the present times, particularly when India is endeavouring towards a “Vivad Mukt Bharat”, considerable emphasis is being placed on mediation. In the opinion of this Court, compelling a party to file a written statement, thereby shifting the focus towards adversarial litigation, would mean swimming against the tide favouring mediation,” Justice Prasad observed.
The Court passed the order after a litigant filed a chamber appeal against an order of the Joint Registrar who had condoned the delay by the defendants in filing the written statement
The joint registrar had excluded nearly four months spent in mediation proceedings.
It was stated that the parties had been referred to mediation in September 2023, but settlement efforts failed in January 2024
Subsequently, the defendants filed their written statement
In a 22-page judgement, Justice Prasad noted that the Delhi High Court precedents were divided on whether mediation time can be excluded from the mandatory timeline prescribed under chapter VII of the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018.
He added that an authoritative pronouncement is necessary to avoid conflicting decisions by the joint registrars. Therefore, he referred the issue to a larger bench.
Advocates Tushar Mahajan, Bhaavan Mahajan and Tanmay S Surana appeared for Vedpal Singh
Vedpal Singh v Satishpal & Ors.pdf
Preview
SCROLL FOR NEXT
