Bar Council of India Issues Notices to Geeta Institute of Law Panipat Over Alleged Coercive Demand of Rs 1500 Farewell Charges Linked to Admit Cards and Practical Examination Clearance | LawStreet
HomeLegal InsidersBar Council of India Issues Notices to Geeta Institute of Law, Panipat Over Alleged Coercive Demand of Rs. 1,500 Farewell Charges Linked to Admit Cards and Practical Examination Clearance [Read Letter]
Legal Insiders
Bar Council of India Issues Notices to Geeta Institute of Law, Panipat Over Alleged Coercive Demand of Rs. 1,500 Farewell Charges Linked to Admit Cards and Practical Examination Clearance [Read Letter]
By
LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK
2 months ago 0 Comments
Your browser does not support the audio element.
The Bar Council of India issued two successive show cause notices in a single day on 29th April 2026 to the Principal of Geeta Institute of Law, Panipat, Haryana, directing the institution to immediately ensure that no eligible law student is denied or delayed admit card, NOC clearance, or practical examination permission on account of non-payment of farewell charges, and calling for a detailed compliance report with supporting documents within 48 hours. Both communications were issued under the directions of the Co-Chairman of the Standing Committee on Legal Education and were signed by Srimanto Sen, Principal Secretary, Bar Council of India.
The matter arose from complaints alleging that the institution had uploaded a sum of Rs. 1,500 under the head “Other Fees, Farewell Charges” in the student ERP portal for final semester students of the law degree course, and that non-payment of this amount was being linked with the issuance of admit cards, NOC clearance, and permission to appear in practical examinations. The urgency was acute: the practical examinations were scheduled for 30.04.2026 and the final semester examinations were to commence from 07.05.2026.
An earlier notice bearing reference BCI:D:288/2026 had been issued earlier the same day asking the institution to furnish an immediate explanation. In response, the institution stated by email that no farewell fee had been prescribed or collected, that no farewell party was organised by the college, that no fine had been collected, that no admit card had yet been issued to any student, and that the complaint had been sent by an unknown person with mala fide intention
The Bar Council of India was not satisfied with this reply. After receiving the institution’s response, the Council received further complaints and documentary material from students, including screenshots of the student ERP portal reflecting an entry of Rs. 1,500 under the head “Other Fees — Farewell Charges” for the 10th Semester, WhatsApp communications relating to payment of farewell amounts, and a notice concerning completion of NOC requirements for issuance of admit cards. Students further alleged that this ERP entry had been uploaded against the accounts of students who had not attended or paid for any farewell function. Crucially, the Bar Council also received a screenshot of a WhatsApp group communication stated to relate to an earlier batch of the same institution, recording that students not paying the farewell amount would not be allowed to give practicals and that admit cards would not be issued. Though relating to an earlier batch, the Council noted this communication as relevant for examining whether such a practice or pattern had existed in the institution and whether similar coercive conditions were being applied in the current academic year.
The second notice, bearing reference BCI:D 294:2026 (LE), took serious note of the contradiction between the institution’s categorical denial and the material now placed before the Council. It called upon the institution to specifically state whether the screenshots, WhatsApp messages, and ERP records brought to its notice were genuine or false, and if disputed, to produce comprehensive supporting records including ERP ledgers, fee head creation records, circulars, WhatsApp group communications, internal instructions, and details of persons authorised to upload or circulate such information.
The Bar Council also addressed the institution’s attempt to deflect the complaint by questioning the identity of the named sender. The Council clarified that the grievance before it was not confined to the identity of one complainant. The substance of the complaint related to whether students of the law degree course had been subjected to a compulsory farewell charge, or whether such charge had been linked, directly or indirectly, with no dues, practical examinations, admit card issuance, or examination clearance. The institution was required to answer the substance of the allegations. The Council further clarified that it was not required to disclose the identity of students who had approached it, particularly where those students had expressed apprehension of academic repercussions, and the institution was directed not to insist upon complainant identity as a condition for responding.
The communication laid down the applicable legal position clearly: no student who is otherwise eligible under academic, attendance, examination and university norms can be deprived of practical examination, admit card, provisional admit card, NOC clearance, or permission to appear in final semester examination merely on account of non-payment of any farewell charge, contribution, optional event fee, or other non-academic demand. A farewell function, whether organised by the institution, by students, or informally, cannot be made a condition precedent for any academic clearance or examination appearance.
Within 48 hours, the institution was directed to place on record nine categories of information: the complete ERP fee statement for all 9th and 10th semester students showing all fee heads; the date, authority and purpose of creation of the Rs. 1,500 entry; a statement on whether any student had paid this amount; copies of all circulars, WhatsApp messages, notices and internal instructions relating to farewell charges and admit card issuance; a clarification on whether any staff member ever communicated that non-payment of farewell charges would affect examination eligibility; the present status of admit card and NOC clearance for final semester students; a clarification on whether any student’s ERP account reflected this liability; copies of any rules or approvals under which the farewell amount was uploaded; and a written undertaking that no student shall be victimised for approaching the Bar Council or raising a grievance, with no adverse action in internal marks, viva voce, project evaluation, no dues, or admit card issuance on account of any such complaint.
The institution was warned that any act of victimisation, intimidation, indirect pressure, arbitrary deduction of marks, withholding of clearance, or denial of practical examination for any student who had approached the Bar Council would be viewed seriously, and that if farewell charges were found to have been imposed as a compulsory condition for academic clearance, the Bar Council would be constrained to initiate appropriate action under the Rules of Legal Education
LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK
About:
Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To
Follow:
Related Posts
View All
Supreme Court upholds order to bar Advocate from practice for running taxi service [Read Order]
The Supreme Court upholds the decision to bar an advocate from practicing law for one year due to misconduct related to running a taxi service. The court found serious allegations against the appellant and confirmed the disciplinary committee’s decision
Judiciary- Sep 05, 2023
Bipartisan effort in passage of women’s reservation bill in Parliament: CJI
Discover the commendable bipartisan effort behind the passage of the women’s reservation bill in Parliament, as highlighted by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud. Explore the significance of institutional collaboration in achieving justice and the parallels with the drafting of the Indian Constitution. Learn how diverse backgrounds and conflicting ideologies came together for a common cause
Legal Insiders- Sep 25, 2023
Prime Minister Modi Advocates Simple Legal Language and Accessible Laws To Make Common Man Understand It
In his address at the International Lawyers Conference 2023, Prime Minister Narendra Modi underscores the importance of simplifying legal language and processes for common citizens. He discusses efforts to make laws more accessible and highlights the role of technology in streamlining legal procedures
Executive- Sep 25, 2023
“Stop calling me ‘My Lord’ in return for half of my salary”: Supreme Court judge shuns colonial-era practice
While in 2006, the Bar Council of India had passed a resolution that no advocate would address judges as “My Lords” and “Your Lordships”, it failed to be followed in practice. A Supreme Court judge’s recent reaction to being called ‘My Lord’ brought up the matter again
Judiciary- Nov 03, 2023
TRENDING NEWS
TrendingJudiciary
Does Disagreeing with An Earlier Ruling Make a Judgment Per Incuriam? Supreme Court Answers [Read Judgment]
18 hours ago
TrendingJudiciary
Contractor Not Barred from Claiming Loss of Profit for Unexecuted Works: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
17 hours ago
TOP STORIES
View All
TrendingJudiciary
Karnataka HC Refuses To Quash Case Against Wife Accused Of Sharing Rape Videos
6 days ago
TrendingJudiciary
SC Declines Urgent Hearing On Ram Mandir Donation Embezzlement Probe
6 days ago
TrendingJudiciary
Gujarat HC Dismisses PIL On Somnath Temple Survey Fines Rs. 2 Lakh Cost
6 days ago
TrendingInternational
India Sends MoS Margherita and Bihar Governor to Khamenei’s State Funeral
5 days ago
View All
ADVERTISEMENT
×
